Economic Strategy

Economic Strategy

Scenarios and consequences of Iraq's energy independence and replacing gas and electricity imports from Iran With an emphasis on the general policies in the field of energy

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Department of West Asian and African Studies, Faculty of World Studies, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
2 Master's student in Iraqi studies, Faculty of World Studies, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
10.22034/es.2026.550527.1898
Abstract
The issue of Iraq's energy independence and reducing its reliance on gas and electricity imports from Iran is a strategic and multifaceted challenge with significant economic and geopolitical implications for both countries. This study aims to clarify the dimensions of Iraq's energy dependence on Iran, analyze ongoing projects in Iraq related to gas, electricity, and renewable energy, and examine the impact of extensive investments in these sectors on reducing dependency by 2030. The theoretical framework is based on the International Energy Agency's (IEA) concept of energy security and scenario analysis, which identifies key driving forces, critical uncertainties, likely scenarios, and assesses their consequences. The research employs an analytical approach using data from Iraq's energy projects and scenario-based analysis. Findings indicate that achieving scenarios ranging from relative to full independence, along with a green leap in renewable energy development, could substantially reduce Iraq's dependence on Iran, with considerable effects on Iran's energy security and economy and this trend is directly related to the general policies of the Islamic Republic of Iran in the field of energy - especially the emphasis on "diversifying markets," "increasing electricity and gas exports," and "consolidating Iran's position in regional energy markets.". Four distinct future scenarios for Iraq are presented, each with specific strengths and weaknesses: relative independence, full independence, sustained dependence, and a green leap. The study concludes that Iran should adopt adaptive policies focusing on cooperation and technology transfer to maintain its critical position in Iraq's energy market.
Keywords
Subjects

آدمی، علی و شکری، مرتضی (1400). جایگاه ایران در آینده ژئوپلیتیک انرژی عراق. فصلنامه روابط خارجی، 13(4)، 755-784.
چیت‌ساززاده، امیرحسین و حسن‌تاش، سید غلامحسین (1399). مطالعه تطبیقی سیاست‌گذاری صادرات گاز طبیعی در چهارچوب مؤلفه‌های امنیت انرژی در روسیه، قطر و ایران. فصلنامه علمی پژوهشی راهبرد اقتصادی، 9(33)، 37-69.
حسین محمود (2024). أمن الطاقة فی العراق بعد عام 2014 (الغاز الطبیعی) انموذجا. مجلة دراسات دولیة، (99).
دانة غاز (2025، أبریل 3). إنجاز بلوغ إنتاج 500 ملیون برمیل نفط مکافئ فی حقل خور مور [بیان صحفی]. دانة غاز: https://www.danagas.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/AR-Pearl-Milestone-Press-Release-03042025.pdf
زیاد فاضل عبدالله (2024). معطیات الطاقة المتجددة وافاق تطورها فی العراق. Journal of Tikrit University for Humanities، (31).‏
سیاست‌های کلی نظام در زمینه «انرژی»:  https://farsi.khamenei.ir/news-content?id=29280
شرکة نفط میسان (2025). رئیس مجلس الوزراء یفتتح مشروع استثمار ومعالجه الغاز المصاحب GPP فی حقل الحلفایة النفطی: https://moc.oil.gov.iq/?article=360
شرکة غاز البصرة (2025). مشروع معمل البصرة لتسییل الغاز(BNGL) . تم الاسترجاع فی 20 أغسطس 2025، من https://www.basrahgas.com/our-operations/our-growth-projects-bngl/?lang=ar
میدل ایست نیوز (2024)، 15 میلیارد دلار، ارزش کل صادرات گاز ایران به عراق: https://mdeast.news/?p=267766
وزارة التخطیط (2025). العارض الفنی لمشروع الغاز المتکامل [ملف PDF]. موقع وزارة التخطیط:
وزارة النفط العراقیة (2025). تقریر الإنتاج النفطی. الموقع الرسمی لوزارة النفط العراقیة: https://oil.gov.iq/?article=2773
وسام ناظم الخیکانی (2023). مستقبل الصراع الدولی والإقلیمی على الموارد الطبیعیة فی العراق. المرکز الدیمقراطی العربی.
 
Amer, M.; Daim, T. & Jetter, A. (2013). A review of scenario planning. Futures, (46), 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2012.10.003
Bradfield, R.; Wright, G.; Burt, G.; Cairns, G. & Van Der Heijden, K. (2005). The origins and evolution of scenario techniques in long range business planning. Futures, 37(8), 795–812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2005.01.003
Cherp, A. & Jewell, J. (2014). The concept of energy security: Beyond the four As. Energy policy, (75), 415-421.
Cherp, A.; Vinichenko, V.; Jewell, J.; Brutschin, E. & Sovacool, B. (2017). Comparing electricity transitions: A historical analysis of nuclear, wind and solar power in Germany and the UK. Energy Policy, (101), 612–628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.11.015
Hammed, K. N.; Khalil, S. I. & Raoof, H. H. (2025). Energy Security Strategy in Iraq: A Vision of Nature and Transformations after the Defeat of ISIS. Geopolitics Quarterly, 21(2), 11-28. doi: 10.22034/igq.2024.456711.1868
IPCC. (2022). Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg3/
Jorion, P. (2007). Financial risk manager handbook (4th ed.). Wiley.
Novikau, A. (2021). Conceptualizing and redefining energy security: A comprehensive review. China’s Energy Security: Analysis, Assessment and Improvement, 37-59.
Petroleum Economist Ltd. (2024). Energising Iraq [PDF]. https://gulfenergyinfo.com/media/3180/pe1024-iraq-report-final.pdf
Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1995). Scenario planning: A tool for strategic thinking. Sloan Management Review, 36(2), 25–40.
Strojny, J.; Krakowiak-Bal, A.; Knaga, J. & Kacorzyk, P. (2023). Energy security: a conceptual overview. Energies, 16(13), 5042.
Wright, G.; Cairns, G. & Bradfield, R. (2013). Scenario methodology: New developments in theory and practice. Futures, (46), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2012.10.001
Zhiznin, S. Z.; Timohov, V. M. & Dineva, V. (2020). Energy security: Theoretical interpretations and quantitative evaluation. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 10(2), 390-400.

  • Receive Date 04 October 2025
  • Revise Date 06 December 2025
  • Accept Date 20 December 2025