Economic Strategy

Economic Strategy

Comparative Analysis of Geo-economic Theories: Implications for International Relations

Document Type : Original Article

Author
Davood Manzoor
تهران
10.22034/es.2023.366806.1627
Abstract
 Governments are increasingly using economic tools such as trade and investment in power politics. How to use economic power to achieve geostrategic goals is one of the central topics in the contemporary international relations literature. Unlike the geopolitical approach, which relies on territorial characteristics, the geoeconomic approach, by exploiting asymmetric vulnerabilities in economic relations, opens another path for the application of power policies to states so that The use of economic power is one of the main tools in the macro strategy of countries. Geoeconomics, in addition to providing a framework for selecting strategic actions, is an analytical approach in the field of international relations. In this article, using the concept of geoeconomics, while criticizing the discourse of liberal interdependence, we explain how power and security today go beyond mere physical control over territorial borders and need to control economic relations with other countries. For this purpose, while introducing the basics of geoeconomic discourse, we meta-analyze theories and studies of geoeconomics and finally analyze the results, especially the application of geoeconomic approach in power politics. According to the findings of this study, strengthening the position of each country in the international order requires that policymakers focus on strategies to strengthen economic growth taking the geoeconomic opportunities into account. They should carefully identify their geoeconomic advantages and use geoeconomic tools to increase their economic competitiveness. They should also monitor the geo-economic initiatives of regional and international competitors and strengthen economic infrastructures and institutions against geo-economic threats, especially cyber attacks.
Keywords
Geoeconomics
Geopolitics
International Relations
Political Economy
Constructivism

Subjects

Aaltola, M.; Käpylä, J.; Mikkola, H. and Behr, T. (2014). Towards the Geopolitics of Flows: Implications for Finland, FIIA Report No. 40 (Helsinki: The Finnish Institute of International Affairs). Available at: www.fiia.fi/en/publication/towards-the-geopolitics-of-flows.
Andreasson, S. (2015). ‘British and US Strategies in the Competition for Energy Resources in Sub- Saharan Africa’, in Scholvin, S. (ed.), A New Scramble for Africa? The Rush for Energy Resources in Sub-S aharan Africa (Farnham: Ashgate), 13-31.
Baev, Pavel K. (2018). The Russian ‘Pivot’ to Asia-Pacific: Geo-economic Expectations and Disappointments, in Mikael Wigell, ed., Geo-economics and Power Politics in the 21st Century: the Revival of Economic Statecraft. London: Routledge.
Baracuhy, Braz (2018). ‘Geo-economics as a dimension of grand strategy: Notes on the concept and its evolution’ in Mikael Wigell (ed.), Geo-Economics and Power Politics in the 21st Century: The Revival of Economic Statecraft, London: Routledge.
Barma, N.; Ratner, E. and Weber, S. (2014). ‘Welcome to a World without the West’, National Interest, 12 November. Available at: http://nationalinterest.org/feature/ welcome-the-world- without-the-w est-11651.
Barton, J. R. (1999). Flags of Convenience: Geoeconomics and Regulatory Minimisation. 90(2), 142-155.
Baru, S. (2012). Geo-economics and Strategy. Survival, 54(3), 47-58.
Blackwill, R. D. and Harris, J. M. (2016). War by Other Means: Geoeconomics and Statecraft (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
Brattberg, E. and Hamilton, D. (2014). “Introduction’, in Brattberg, E. and Hamilton, D. (eds), Global Flow Security: A New Security Agenda for the Transatlantic Community in 2030 (Washington: Center for Transatlantic Relations), v‒vii.
Buzan, B.; Wæver, O. and de Wilde, J. (1997). Security: A New Framework for Analysis (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner).
Coleman, M. (2005). U.S. Statecraft and the US–Mexico Border as Security/Economy Nexus. Political Geography, 24(2), 189-205.
Cowen, D. and Smith, N. (2009). After Geopolitics? From the Geopolitical Social to Geoeconomics. Antipode, 41(1), 22-48.
Dalby, S. (1990). Creating the Second Cold War: The Discourse of Politics. London: Pinter.
Flemes, D. (2010). Brazil: Strategic Options in the Changing World Order, in Flemes, D. (ed.), Regional Leadership in the Global System: Ideas, Interests and Strategies of Regional Powers. New York: Routledge, 93-112.
Fukuyama, F. (1992). The End of History and the Last Man. New York: Avon Books.
Grosse, T. G. (2014). Geoeconomic Relations between the EU and China: The Lessons from the EU Weapon Embargo and from Galileo. Geopolitics, 19(1), 40-65.
Haass, R. (2017). A World in Disarray: American Foreign Policy and the Crisis of the Old Order. New York: Penguin Books.
Hirschman, A. (1945). National Power and the Structure of Foreign Trade. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Holslag, J. (2016). Geoeconomics in a Globalized World: The Case of China’s Export Policy. Asia Europe Journal, 14(2), 173-184.
Hsiung, J. C. (2009). The Age of Geoeconomics, China’s Global Role, and Prospects of Cross-strait Integration. Journal of Chinese Political Science, 14(2), 113-133.
Hudson, V. M.; Ford, R. E.; Pack, D. and Giordano, E. R. (1991). Why the Third World Matters, Why Europe Probably Won’t: The Geoeconomics of Circumscribed Engagement. Journal of Strategic Studies, 14(3), 255-298.
Huntington, S. P. (1993). Why International Primacy Matters. International Security, 17(4), 68-83.
Kaczmarski, M. (2017). Non-W estern Visions of Regionalism: China’s New Silk Road and Russia’s Eurasian Economic Union. International Affairs, 93(6), 1357-1376.
Käpylä, J. and Mikkola, H. (2016). The Promise of the Geo-economic Arctic: A Critical Analysis. Asia Europe Journal, 14(2), 203-220.
Kundnani, H. (2011). Germany as a Geo-economic Power. Washington Quarterly, 34(3), 31-45.
Leonard, M. (2016). Introduction: Connectivity Wars, in Leonard, M. (ed.), Connectivity Wars: Why Migration, Finance and Trade Are the Geo-economic Battlegrounds of the Future. London: European Council on Foreign Relations, 13-30.
Londoño, Ernesto (2014). U.S. to Partially Resume Military Aid to Egypt. Washington Post, April 22, 2014.
Luttwak, E. N. (1990). From Geopolitics to Geo- economics: Logic of Conflict, Grammar of Commerce. The National Interest, (20), 17-23.
Luttwak, E. N. (1993). The Endangered American Dream: How to Stop the United States from Becoming a Third- World Country and How to Win the Geo-economic Struggle for Industrial Supremacy. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Mandelbaum, M. (2002). The Ideas that Conquered the World: Peace, Democracy, and Free Markets in the Twenty-First Century. New York: Public Affairs.
Mattlin, M. and Wigell, M. (2016). Geoeconomics in the Context of Restive Regional Powers. Asia Europe Journal, 14(2), 125-134.
McDonald, D. A. (ed.) (2009). Electric Capitalism, Recolonising Africa on the Power Grid. Cape Town: HSRC Press.
Mead, W. R. (2014). The Return of Geopolitics: The Revenge of the Revisionist Powers. Foreign Affairs, 93(3), 69-79.
Mercille, J. (2008). The Radical Geopolitics of US Foreign Policy: Geopolitical and Geoeconomic Logics of Power. Political Geography, 27(5), 570-586.
MokhtariHashi, H. (2018). Explaining the Concept of Geoeconomics and ‎Recommendations for Iran. International Quarterly of Geopolitics, 14(50), 56-82. (In Persian)
Morrissey, J. (2011). Closing the Neoliberal Gap: Risk and Regulation in the Long War of Securitization. Antipode, 43(3), 874-900.
Mottola, K. (2018). US grand strategy in flux: geo-economics, geopolitics and the liberal international order, in Mikael Wigell (ed.), Geo-Economics and Power Politics in the 21st Century: The Revival of Economic Statecraft, London: Routledge.
Naghshbandi, A.; Dehshiri, M.; Keshishyan G. and Ghaedi, M. (2021). Political and Economic Consequences of the US Withdrawal from JCPOA for Iran in the Trump Era and beginning of Biden’s Presidency. 17(3), 157-176. (In Persian)
O’Hara, S. and Heffernan, M. (2006). From Geo-Strategy to Geo-economics: The “Heartland” and British Imperialism Before and After Mackinder. Geopolitics, 11(1), 54-73.
Rossbach, Niklas (2018). Energy and the future of US primacy: The geostrategic consequences of the shale revolution, in Mikael Wigell (ed.), Geo-Economics and Power Politics in the 21st Century: The Revival of Economic Statecraft, London: Routledge.
 Safari, F.; Ahmadi, H. and Barzegar, K. (2021). A Study of the Sino-Russian Approach to Regional Order in Eurasia. 18(1), 83-102. (In Persian)
Scholvin, S. (2016). Geographical Conditions and Political Outcomes. Comparative Strategy, 35(4), 274-283.
Scholvin, S. and Malamud, A. (2014). Is There a Geoeconomic Node in South America? Geography, Politics and Brazil’s Role in Regional Economic Integration. ICS Working Paper, N 2/2014. Available at: www.ics.ul.pt/publicacoes/workingpapers/ wp2014/ wp2014_2.pdf.
Scholvin, S. and Wigell, M. (2018). Power Politics by Economic Means: Geo-economics as an Analytical Approach and Foreign Policy Practice. Comparative Strategy, 37(1), 73-84.
Scott, D. (2008). The Great Power “Great Game” Between India and China: The Logic of Geography. Geopolitics, 13(1), 1-26.
Shauk, Zain (2013). Malware on Oil Rig Computers Raises Security Fears. Houston Chronicle, February 22, 2013.
Steil, B. and Litan, R. (2006). Financial Statecraft: The Role of Financial Markets in American Foreign Policy. New Haven, Conn: Yale University Press.
Vihma, A. and Wigell, M. (2016). Unclear and Present Danger: Russia’s Geoeconomics and the Nord Stream II Pipeline. Global Affairs, 2(4), 377-388.
Washington Post (2017). U.S. Threatens Countries with Loss of Aid over U.N. Vote on Jerusalem. Washington Post, 20 December. Available at: www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/us-threatens-countries-with-loss-of-aid-over-un-jerusalem- vote/2017/12/20/3ddacadc-e5bc-11e7-833f-155031558ff4_story.html?utmterm=.3607d559bae2.
White House (2017). National Security Strategy of the United States of America. The White House, December. Available at: http://nssarchive.us/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/2017. pdf.
Wigell, M. (2016). Conceptualizing Regional Powers’ Geoeconomic Strategies: Neo-Imperialism, Neo-Mercantilism, Hegemony, and Liberal Institutionalism. Asia Europe Journal, 14(2), 135-151.
Youngs, R. (2011). Geo-economic Futures, in Martiningui, A. and Youngs, R. (eds), Challenges for European Foreign Policy in 2012: What Kind of Geo-economic Europe? (Madrid: Fundación para las Relaciones Internacionales y el Diálogo Exterior), 13-17.

  • Receive Date 22 October 2022
  • Revise Date 19 January 2023
  • Accept Date 03 May 2023