The Foresight of Iran's heavy crude oil export in 2040: a scenario writing approach

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 General Director of Asia, Africa & Oceania- Deputy Minister of International Affairs- Petroleum Ministery

2 Assistance professor, Department of Energy, Agricultural and environment economics, faculty of economics, Allameh Tabatabae'i University

3 Department of Energy,Agricultural and Environment economics, faculty of economics, Allameh Tabataba'i university

Abstract

Heavy oil as an unconventional oil resource contains 15 and 10.5 percentage of global hydrocarbon proven reserves and production respectively. Since the share of conventional and tight oil in world oil production is dwindling, it is expected that heavy oil play an important role in global market in the long-term. Therefore, countries with massive heavy oil reserve such as Iran would be significant players in the future.
This paper aims to identify the national and global key factors and driving forces which play significant roles in reshaping the Iran’s heavy oil future, then presents Iran’s heavy oil export plausible scenarios by 2040.
The 27 key factors were extracted using the Delphi method through questionnaires and environment scanning based on the STEEP framework using mathematical and statistical analysis. In the next step, the application of Cross impact analysis identifies the 16 driving forces of the Iran’s future heavy oil export using the MicMac software.
Then based on academic literature and expert panel, 60 variants identified for all descriptors. In the next step, 16 consistence and plausible scenarios have been chosen using scenario wizard software. At the end, after evaluating and endorsing all the 16 scenarios by the expert panel, 5 final scenarios named “In the Sanction’s Labyrinth”, “East Without West”, “The Great Virus”, “The bond with the World” and “The Lost Opportunities” have been written.

Keywords


  • Alipour, M., R. Hafezi, M. Amer and A. N. Akhavan (2017). "A new hybrid fuzzy cognitive map-based scenario planning approach for Iran's oil production pathways in the post–sanction period." Energy 135: 851-864.
  • Amer M, Daim TU, Jetter A (2013) A review of scenario planning. Futures 46:23–40
  • Ansari, D. and F. Holz (2019). "Anticipating global energy, climate and policy in 2055: Constructing qualitative and quantitative narratives." Energy Research & Social Science 58: 101250.
  • Azadi, A.K., Yarmohammad, M.H., 2011. Analysis of Iran's crude oil export future capacity. Energy Policy 39 (6), 3316e3326.
  • Benedict, B. A. (2017). "Benefits of Scenario Planning Applied to Energy Development." Energy Procedia 107: 304-308.
  • Bentham, J. (2014). "The scenario approach to possible futures for oil and natural gas." Energy Policy 64: 87-92.
  • Bishop, P. (2007). "The current state of scenario development: an overview of techniques." Foresight 9(1): 5-25.
  • Blazev, A. S. (2016). Global Energy Market Trends, Fairmont Press, Incorporated, CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group.
  • BP (2021). BP Energy Outlook, British Petroleum.
  • Bradfield, R., G. Wright, G. Burt, G. Cairns and K. Van Der Heijden (2005). "The origins and evolution of scenario techniques in long range business planning." Futures 37(8): 795-812.
  • Chaharsooghi, S., M. Rezaei, M. J. I. j. o. e. s. Alipour and technology (2015). "Iran’s energy scenarios on a 20-year vision." 12(11): 3701-3718.
  • ENI (2020), world oil report
  • EIA (2016). International Energy Outlook 2016, U.S. Energy Information Administration.
  • Fahey, L. and Robert M. R. (1998); “Learning from the future, competitive foresight scenarios “,Canada: John wiley & sons Inc.
  • Ghasemian, S. Faridzad, A. Abbaszadeh, P. Taklif, A. Ghasemi, A, Hafezi, R. An overview of global energy scenarios by 2040: identifying the driving forces using cross‑impact analysis method, International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, April 2020, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-020-02738-5.
  • Glenn, J. C. and T. J. Gordon (2009). Futures Research Methodology-Version 3-0, Editorial desconocida.
  • Godet, M. (2000). "The Art of Scenarios and Strategic Planning: Tools and Pitfalls." Technological Forecasting and Social Change 65(1): 3-22.
  • Gordon, T. J. (1994). Cross-impact method, American Council for the United Nations University.
  • IEA (2015). World Energy Outlook Special Report, International Energy Agency.
  • IEA (2021). World Energy Outlook Special Report, International Energy Agency.
  • IHS (2020), global petroleum database
  • Jefferson, M. (2012). "Shell scenarios: What really happened in the 1970s and what may be learned for current world prospects." Technological Forecasting and Social Change 79(1): 186-197.
  • Kahn, H. A.J. Wiener, (1967). The Year 2000: A Framework for Speculation on the Next Thirty-Three Years, The Macmillan, New York.
  • Miller, K.D.,Waller G.H., “Scenarios, real options and integrated risk management”, Long Range Planning 36, 2003; p.93–107.
  • Mietzner, D. and G. Reger (2005). "Advantages and disadvantages of scenario approaches for strategic foresight." International Journal Technology Intelligence and Planning 1(2): 220-239.
  • Pillkahn, U. (2008). Using trends and scenarios as tools for strategy development: shaping the future of your enterprise, John Wiley & Sons.
  • Ringland, G. (1998). Scenario planning: Managing for the future. New York: Wiley.
  • Schoemaker, P. J. (1991). "When and how to use scenario planning: a heuristic approach with illustration." Journal of forecasting 10(6): 549-564.
  • Schoemaker, P. J. (1995). "Scenario planning: a tool for strategic thinking." Sloan management review 36(2): 25-50.
  • Wack, P. (1985). "Ж scenarios: uncharted waters ahead." Harvard Business Review September–October.
  • Weimer-Jehle, W. (2006); “Cross impact (CIB)”, science direct, Technological forecasting & social change, vol 73, pp334-361.
  • Weimer-Jehle, W. (2008); “Scenariowizard Basic2.3”, Manual, university of Stuttgart.